2010/1/26 Giel van Schijndel <[email protected]>: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:03:44PM +0100, Giel van Schijndel wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:10:42PM +1100, Graham Dumpleton wrote: >>> Let me know how it goes. I'll review the code a bit more and perhaps >>> also include my other changes to make it more robust. The potential >>> problems in it may explain some of the other very rare problems on >>> Linux platforms. >> >> Running it for 30 minutes now. No problems so far. Last time I had >> timeout problems immediately, I'm guessing caused by a dead lock which >> that patch fixes. >> >> Either way, I'll leave it running for now until problems arise (in which >> case I'll gladly notify you again). > > Some time later, and now it seems that the daemon crashed. At least I > think it must have, considering that it didn't leave anything in the > logs, except for timeouts around when the daemon must have gone. No > coredump either.
I'll give you an updated patch shortly then which includes the other changes I figured are required to make it more robust on platforms where conditional wait can actually return even though condition not satisfied. Graham -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "modwsgi" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi?hl=en.
