The big problem with my +8 is the cross-member under the gearbox. Being nearly 
central, even the "one wheel over the bump" technique doesn't work.

Cheers,
Owen.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Gary Kneisley 
  To: mogtalk2 
  Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2012 6:36 PM
  Subject: Re: [mogtalk2] Roadster- Advice


  Comparing the clearance of a plus 8 to that of a Roadster requires the 
consideration that a plus 8 sump is steel, and will absorb a grounding shock 
much more readily than the cast alloy sump found on roadsters.  The extra 3/4 
inch provded by the Mulberry modified sump is further insurance against 
catastrophic grounding, though not a total protection.  My previous plus 8 took 
some serious thumps that surely would have destroyed my roadster sump.  

  Gary K 




   
  On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Richard Jones 
<[email protected]> wrote:

    We had a debate about ground clearance a couple of years ago - On the flat 
the plus 8 sump just clears a house brick on edge (4 1/2 "), although the hoop 
behind the gearbox is 1/2 inch lower and grounds on it -  from memory I  think 
roadsters were nearer 3 1/2"  and did read a story about a roadster sump being 
ripped open by the lip on a gate bolt latch because the drive approach was 
slightly concave. Have seen a replacement sump for a roadster that lifts it 1/2 
inch or so .Bottom line in  a +8 or roadster - you cannot put a wheel either 
side of a square shaped speed bump without risk of grounding - one wheel has to 
go over it and those rubber black and yellow stripped humps used all over the 
place need to be approached with care. - if on a convex slope they must be 
circumvented or you will beach.
    I can ground in multi story car parks when going on to the ramps between 
flloors if they are steep 

    Richard M800RGN+8


    From: Andy Garlick <[email protected]>
    To: mogtalk2 <[email protected]> 
    Sent: Saturday, 4 August 2012, 11:36
    Subject: Re: [mogtalk2] Roadster- Advice

    David,
    I don't think there are any particular issues with the Roadster other than 
the very low sump. Check this carefully on a ramp and ensure that it has not 
had any large chunks taken out of it. There have been some reports of problems 
with the dual mass flywheel, but I think this is more prevalent with the 
competition cars. 
    On early Roadsters the back axle tramps very badly on power take off , but 
many will have been modified with one (or two) anti-tramp bars either by the 
factory , or by dealers or the excellent Peter Mulberry.
    Other than that just check all the normal Morgan issues, condition, 
condition, condition, good service history, and a colour combination that your 
friend likes.  
    I cannot help on values, just look around a make sure he looks at several 
cars before deciding.


    Andy 


      From: David Jones <[email protected]>
      To: mogtalk2 <[email protected]> 
      Sent: Saturday, 4 August 2012, 10:31
      Subject: [mogtalk2] Roadster- Advice

      Some advice please, and somewhat similar to a recent thread. A good pal 
of mine has decided to return to the world of Morgan after an absence of many 
years. His previous Mog was a +8 so he remembers the little foibles of Morgan 
ownership.
      He looked at the new roadster but does not like the pedal arrangement, he 
has driven my ’98 4-4 and prefers that layout.  He has settled on acquiring a 
second-hand Roadster no older than 5-6 years. Are there any issues/problems he 
should look out for?
      Thanks 
      TC
      David 

       
      View posts on The Mail Archive 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
            Modify Your Subscription  

    View posts on The Mail Archive 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
          Modify Your Subscription  

    View posts on The Mail Archive 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

          Modify Your Subscription  



  View posts on The Mail Archive 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

        Modify Your Subscription  

  No virus found in this message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5180 - Release Date: 08/05/12



-------------------------------------------
View posts on The Mail Archive
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ 
[http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/]

Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=22459785&id_secret=22459785-4a39ddf8
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to