I agree Bill, Lightroom's RAW support is often quicker (for Olympus, Apple's RAW support is almost non-existent. There's seems to be a general feeling in the on-line community though that Apple will react quicker to supporting the OM-D E-M5 as it looks like the release that the mu43 community has been waiting for. I'm really impressed with the results straight out of the box - even in JPEG!!
David On 13 May 2012, at 11:38, William Noble wrote: > David > > I have both Aperture 3 and Adobe Lightroom 4 and agree that Apple can be very > tardy at upgrading their camera support. At present I think Lightroom 4 has > the edge on Aperture and they have always been quicker with RAW support. In > addition the price for Lightroom has been reduced with the latest version and > can be downloaded from Adobe for £106.48. A trial version is also available. > > Bill > > Another satisfied user of MS Office 2011 > > > On 13 May 2012, at 10:19, David Ashworth wrote: > >> There are RAW issues with Aperture once one moves away from Nikon and Canon >> - Apple are at best slow to upgrade (if at all), and as I don't intend >> upgrading Photoshop from CS4 then better .png support would be nice. More >> RAW support in Aperture would be better (then I wouldn't need better .png >> support). >> >> >> David > > View posts on The Mail Archive > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > Modify Your Subscription ------------------------------------------- View posts on The Mail Archive http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ [http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/] Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=22459785&id_secret=22459785-4a39ddf8 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
