On 13/12/06, Jim Trocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it would probably require less effort to just add a "holdalerts" feature
> to the server, or something of that nature.
>
> i can imagine this could be done a few different ways:
>
>      1. walk through the watch structure and disable each
>
>      2. have a global "hold alerts" flag which leaves the
>         watch structure alone but is respected by do_alert
>
> i'd lean towards #2 because it wouldn't blow away any previously
> disabled watches or services.
>
> how's that sound?

I'm definately leaning for #2 - we have alerts that are ack'd (e.g.
Hardware replacement on order, but takes a week to arrive) but not
disabled, and watches that are disabled (e.g. service offline for an
indeterminate time, but will eventually come back).

I'd also like to see it implemented so that you don't need to reload
mon to add a new maintenance slot.

Cheers,
Aled.

_______________________________________________
mon mailing list
mon@linux.kernel.org
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon

Reply via email to