On 6/27/06, Marcus Rueckert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2006-06-27 14:04:53 -0500, Berger, Daniel wrote: > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Metin Amiroff > > >Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 12:14 PM > > >To: [email protected] > > >Subject: Re: [Mongrel] Mongrel, sit!, good god! -- said Rails core. > > > > >Is there any reason for not including Mongrel as a default RoR > > application server besides that "Made with %100 Ruby" argument? > > > > That would require making Mongrel a required dependency for RoR. I > > dunno that they want to do that. > > why? > lighttpd isnt an hard requirement and preferred if found aswell. > so you could do the same with mongrel. > > a simple: > > begin > require "mongrel" > rescue > > should do it no?:) >
yeah, it does: http://rails.techno-weenie.net/question/2006/6/23/starting-mongrel-with-script-server I replaced my script/server with the one I proposed on that page, long time ago. -- Luis Lavena Multimedia systems - Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort, which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that is worthwhile. Vince Lombardi _______________________________________________ Mongrel-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
