> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luis Lavena > Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 1:14 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Mongrel] Mongrel, sit!, good god! -- said Rails core. > > > On 6/27/06, Berger, Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Metin > > Amiroff > > >Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 12:14 PM > > >To: [email protected] > > >Subject: Re: [Mongrel] Mongrel, sit!, good god! -- said Rails core. > > > > >Is there any reason for not including Mongrel as a default RoR > > application server besides that "Made with %100 Ruby" argument? > > > > That would require making Mongrel a required dependency for RoR. I > > dunno that they want to do that. > > > > Actually if mongrel is installed, will run with it, if not, > will default to webrick (like was doing with lighty, now plus > mongrel). Is up to the developer to install mongrel or not, > anyway your rails applications will work. > > http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/4486
Ah, ok. Thanks for the correction Luis. Dan This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments. _______________________________________________ Mongrel-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
