On Jan 3, 2008 10:45 AM, Evan Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For what it's worth, though I am definitely a statistical outlier:
> * Framework, if any (Camping, Merb, Rails, Nitro, Ramaze, IOWA, Rack...) IOWA for production. Dabble with all of them, though, for testing things. > * Mongrel version 1.1.3 > * Mongrel handlers used (rails, dirhandler, camping, cgiwrapper...) Just whatever is appropriate for the framework. The mongrel support is built into IOWA. > * How many mongrel routes and handlers per route registered (if you > don't know, it's probably <= 2) Precious few. > * Any Mongrel plugins used (mongrel_upload_progress, mongrel_gzip, > mongrel_cow_cluster, mongrel_experimental...) No > * Mongrel runners used (mongrel_rails, mongrel::cluster, None > * Number of mongrels per server per app Where I use it, 1. > * Monitoring system (runit, monit, god...) They never crash; never fail. So I don't bother to monitor them specifically. > * Proxy or software loadbalancer, if any (apache mod_proxy_balancer, > nginx, pen...) Swiftiply. > * HW loadbalancer, if any (Netscaler...) None. > * Caching strategy (memcached fragments, memcached object, squid, > rails page cache, rails page fragments, ESI) Static page caching handled by Swiftiply, or no caching. > * Whether you serve media assets via mongrel itself, as opposed to > through a webserver No. > * Operating system including distribution or version (OS X 10.4.10, > Ubuntu/Linux 7.10, WinXP SP2, OpenBSD 4.1...) RHEL 4, Ubuntu Server 6.10, CentOS 4 > * Architecture, via 'uname -a' preferably (x86, x86_64, Sparc, PPC, > Arm (ha), JRuby) Linux server2.enigo.com 2.6.9-55.0.9.ELlargesmp #1 SMP & some Linux 2.4.x kernel boxes. > * CPU count 1, 2, and 4 cpu boxes right now. > * Ruby version including custom distribution patches, > (1.8.6p110+threadhooks, 1.8.5, JRuby 1.1b1, Rubinius trunk... also > note where you got it, in case it isn't clear, for example, OS X 10.5 > built-in, Ubuntu apt, Instant Rails, direct compile from source) Primarily 1.8.5 in production, though I have the most recent 1.8.6 patch level, 1.9.0 and jruby around for testing. > * Rubygems (yes/no, version) Yes. I have not upgraded to the newest release yet. Still on 0.9.4. As for weird stuff....honestly, I don't really run all of Mongrel in production except on one or two older sites. Most of my production apps only use the Mongrel HTTP parser. So most of my mongrel usage these days involves testing it on various versions of Ruby and in various deployments and contortions. Kirk Haines _______________________________________________ Mongrel-users mailing list Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
