On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Matthew Langham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Luis, > > I wasn't blaming mongrel for the performance problems in general. I > realize that we need to look at the Rails application as well. >
Don't worry, I know you didn't, but that post will serve as pointer for future rants ;-) Anyway... > My question was more along the lines of whether we would see any > _additional_ gains in using a newer version of mongrel. I've not seen a "huge" difference between these versions (performance speaking). In any case, it fixed a few issues with mongrel_rails parameters and some security issues with DirHandler, only if you served directly Mongrel and not behind apache or nginx. Forgot to mention: check what are you logging in your log/ files, and how big the became... Ruby don't play nice with bigger files (neither most of the dynamic languages I know of) > Thanks for all your points. No problem man, don't take them personally :-) -- Luis Lavena Multimedia systems - A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. Douglas Adams _______________________________________________ Mongrel-users mailing list Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
