On Sep 14, 2011, at 4:25 PM, Marcus Mülbüsch wrote: > Am 14.09.2011 13:49, schrieb Jan-Henrik Haukeland: >> >> On Sep 14, 2011, at 1:14 PM, Marcus Mülbüsch wrote: >> >>> How do I write a statement that will do one test after the other; and >>> only if the first test succeeded? >> >> This cannot (yet) be expressed in the config language. If-tests are separate >> statements without an 'else if' part. This will be changed in a later >> release, though not optimal, maybe you can use the new check program >> statement and put the test in a script executed by Monit? > > monit 5.3 is not yet in the gentoo portage tree; so this has to wait. > Temporarily we can live with that behaviour. > > However; currently monit cannot connect to the remote SMPP-Server. Since > I'm unable to login via telnet, too, I consider that a problem not related to > monit - to be solved tomorrow :) > > But just as a precaution: Can I increase the loglevel so that I can watch > what monit sends and gets back? So I can watch whether I mis-formated the > string, that is filled with hexcodes?
Yes, if you enable the debug mode (the "-v" command-line option), monit will log what it sent and received. Another option could be tcpdump/snoop/wireshark. I can implement the native SMPP protocol test (could be useful) - can you provide access to the SMPP server? Regards, Martin -- To unsubscribe: https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general
