Hi again,
Good news about the new multihost plans. Now, is there a way - without
rewriting the whole thing - to adapt the current multihost Monitorix
modules to be able to display other graphs than CPU load? For example 'file
system usage' or 'network traffic' or others ? This could be very useful,
as I believe you know, so the user can compare, for example, network
traffic among all the involved nodes.
Sorry to insist. I'm open to writing code and adapting the system, but
maybe there is a better way and you can point me in the right direction.
Thanks
Elias
2016-02-15 18:17 GMT+01:00 Jordi Sanfeliu <jo...@fibranet.cat>:
> Hello Elias,
>
> On 02/15/2016 01:34 PM, monitorix-general-boun...@lists.sourceforge.net
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Jordi,
> >
> >
> > I have installed Monitorix in a set of 5 Raspberrys and it works great
> > on each. It is a smart and useful tool. Thank you very much!!
>
> You're very welcome, I'm glad to know you are enjoying Monitorix.
>
>
> > I have more nodes to be added shortly.
> > I have a tow parts question:
> >
> > 1. I added a new custom graphic by copying one of the .pm modules,
> > renaming and modifying it to initialise, update and request the
> > information I needed.
> >
> > I wonder if there is another default procedure that you would suggest
> > for adding custom graphs from custom data sources.
>
> No, since there isn't any special procedure for this, that's the right
> way to proceed.
>
>
> >
> > 2. I need to specify different graphs, other than the 'system load' for
> > multi server monitoring.
> > I copied the generated page into a static html and changed the URL to
> > request different graphs. This approach lacks some flexibility.
> > I would greatly appreciate if you can help me achieve multi server
> > monitor of any of the graphs.
>
> The 'Multihost' feature should help you exactly on this. Please, check
> the following screenshot to get an idea of it:
>
> <http://www.monitorix.org/imgs/multihost.png>
>
> Multihost option is pending to have a complete rewrite which will
> include numerous new features. I just hope to have enough spare time to
> start developing its next version.
>
>
> >
> > As a side comment, one immediate insight I obtained from Monitorix is to
> > witness the huge performance difference between RPi B+ and RPi 2. The
> > later has 3x less kernel usage than the B+. Although I knew about the
> > difference and I have both models installed, I had not been able to have
> > such a clear comparison until now. Great!!! ....and this is just the
> > beginning....
>
> Heh, that's great! :)
>
>
> >
> > With my due respect and thankfulness,
> >
> > Elias Crespin
> >
>
> Best regards.
>
> --
> Jordi Sanfeliu
> FIBRANET Network Services Provider
> http://www.fibranet.cat
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Monitorix-general mailing list
> Monitorix-general@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monitorix-general
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Monitorix-general mailing list
Monitorix-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monitorix-general
