Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=78075 --- shadow/78075 2006-04-12 16:31:34.000000000 -0400 +++ shadow/78075.tmp.29357 2006-04-12 16:55:20.000000000 -0400 @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ Bug#: 78075 Product: Mono: Class Libraries Version: 1.1 OS: unknown OS Details: -Status: REOPENED +Status: NEEDINFO Resolution: Severity: Unknown Priority: Normal Component: Mono.Security AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] @@ -252,6 +252,22 @@ likely that I was using a 256 bit key (I don't know how to check). We can try to knock down our encryption to 128 bit, but I still think this needs fixed. ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-12 16:31 ------- Sorry, not 33 times slower. Like 13 times slower or something :) + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-12 16:55 ------- +Am I right in assuming that ZMD 6.6.2 wasn't using SSL ? or wasn't +using Mono ? or both ? + +If it was using SSL, what cipher were being used ? (you can use +ethereal and look at the ServerHello message to see the selected cipher). + +Mono's implementation of AES is slow but, even if we matched MS +performance on it, it would only be 4 times faster (i.e. still very +slow compared to the RC4 results). Unless 128bits aren't enough (and I +rarely heard good reasons for that) 256bits is an overkill ;-) + +IIRC Apache/mod_ssl can be configured to restrict the ciphers being +used. You should play with the settings that I bet the best results +will be with RSA/RC4-128/MD5. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
