Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=79434 --- shadow/79434 2007-04-17 11:01:53.000000000 -0400 +++ shadow/79434.tmp.18296 2007-04-18 09:01:54.000000000 -0400 @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ Bug#: 79434 Product: Mono: Compilers Version: 1.0 OS: unknown OS Details: -Status: CLOSED -Resolution: FIXED +Status: REOPENED +Resolution: Severity: Unknown Priority: Minor Component: C# AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] @@ -104,6 +104,33 @@ ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-20 18:25 ------- Please commit + close ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-21 13:55 ------- commited to svn - r74749 + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-18 09:01 ------- +On MS, the order is different if you run the test app on 1.1 or 2.0: + +MS .NET 2.0: +test2 +get_test1 +test3 +set_test4 +get_test4 +get_test5 +set_test5 + +MS .NET 1.1: +set_test5 +get_test5 +get_test4 +set_test4 +test3 +get_test1 +test2 +OK + +Also, compiling an application using csc 1.0 and then forcing it to +run on the 2.0 CLR (by setting the supportedRuntime in the +application configuration file) yields the same result as an +application built using csc 2.0. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
