Hi, why do you dont use the .Net Micro Framework? This is designed to run on this low cost hardware. The other option it to use the mono toolset and build a minimal version of you program as single executable which contains only this what you need and is fully compiled generated at compile time (This is what they did to run Mono apps and the IPhone).
-Steve leblancmeneses schrieb: > >> I think it would be much easier to port Mono to your target platform. > My first post does mention i am aware of .net classes needing > implementation. > > I was planning a partial support of items that would need porting > like: > > System.IO > File, Ports (Serial) > > System.Net > TcpClient, UdpClient > > those namespaces that are hardware dependent > > > I believe > System.Generic.Collections > would be handled by custom compiler itself that will extract from > mscorlib.dll > > > I want to keep the micro under 5 bucks. > I haven't seen any 8 bit controllers running mono ? > > Is there a place listing all the microcontroller mono has been ported > to... what 32 bit controllers of freescale/arm ect? > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ -- mono-cecil -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
