> Mark de Bruijn thanks for the link!! just got some basic stuff working. this is definitely the idea.
this would actually work if i could strip and minimize the glib library for my specific embedded scenario. (hopefully it can be optimized out when i compile using vendors compiler) Example: cat glib.h shows a lot of includes i wouldn't need. this definitely has potential and without any additional work. thanks! >Steve > why do you dont use the .Net Micro Framework? I wouldn't mind trying it (looks like a couple of people might be trying it already): http://www.microchip.com/forums/tm.aspx?m=304148&mpage=1&key=FatFs%2cUSB%2cframework񊐔 but then i'll be relying on microsoft to extend supported devices. Currently they have targeted microcontrollers used in multimedia applications (probably due to surface technology). So anything <32 bit controllers are probably outside their target market. in this case i rather go with mono if i plan extending it to other low architectures. miguel has some ideas on accomplishing using linker tools .. although i currently wouldn't know how to start this yet. Anyone? http://www.desktoplinux.com/articles/AT7746284247.html Although using the glib and vala i'm not sure where i'll end up in size. The benefit i see is it wouldn't be interpreted anymore. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ -- mono-cecil -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
