On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Buryak Alexander <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't think that you do something wrong. I have the same issues with > PDB files and already reported this bug here: > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531630
In the case of 531630, the assembly can be overwritten, and broking the DLL/EXE, not the pdb. If VS can load the assembly but fails to read the pdb then it's a different issue. > But be careful: new PDB file path should be shorter than old one > (yeap, that's another bug of CECIL). This one will be fixed in the release due next monday. > I'm working with r132172 for a halfyear for now and the only annoying > bug I have now is this one: > http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/csharpide/thread/024f9019-699d-44e1-b0f9-43da50782e7d I don't really see how that's related to Cecil if the pdb doesn't expose the variables and that even ildasm doesn't show them. -- Jb Evain <[email protected]> -- -- mono-cecil To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
