On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Jb Evain <[email protected]> wrote: > Could be a bit of both. At the metadata level, Cecil has no idea of > the generic arity of a TypeReference. Most of the time, it infers it > from its usage. Could you provide a small test case?
Don't bother, I wrote one. Thanks. -- Jb Evain <[email protected]> -- -- mono-cecil
