On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Jb Evain <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Jb Evain <[email protected]> wrote: >> Could be a bit of both. At the metadata level, Cecil has no idea of >> the generic arity of a TypeReference. Most of the time, it infers it >> from its usage. Could you provide a small test case? > > Don't bother, I wrote one. Thanks.
And this one is fixed in github. Thanks! -- Jb Evain <[email protected]> -- -- mono-cecil
