I see. That makes sense, actually. Thanks for explaining. On May 18, 4:30 pm, Jb Evain <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Timwi <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm not sure I follow your reasoning. Surely whether it's tricky or > > not is completely independent of whether it's in Rocks or directly in > > Equals? > > Not only it's tricky, but one can expect different behavior. Should a > MethodReference be Equals to another MethodReference when they are > defined in different module ? Most of the time, yes, in some other > places, I'd rather not. > > Another big issue is with generic parameters, should they be compared > by position or by identity when used as an argument. > > So for things like that, I'd rather have the code in Mono.Cecil.Rocks, > and experiment there. If at some point, everyone is happy with it, > we'll move it to Cecil. But it's nice to have Mono.Cecil.Rocks as a > playground. > > -- > Jb Evain <[email protected]> > > -- > -- > mono-cecil
-- -- mono-cecil
