On Oct 10, 9:24 am, Jb Evain <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 3:05 PM, High6 <[email protected]> wrote: > > It makes as much sense as having the TryStart being the previous > > instruction though. It is just inconsistent to have the TryStart be an > > instruction in the Try and have TryEnd to be an instruction outside > > the Try. > > Look, it's not that it's not technically possible. It's just that it > won't change. > > -- > Jb Evain <[email protected]>
It should change though... I see no reason to keep it the way it is. This turns into a nightmare when you have a handler at the end. In a previous revision it would be an Outside instruction. Now it will be null :\. -- -- mono-cecil
