On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 4:27 PM, High6 <[email protected]> wrote: > It should change though... I see no reason to keep it the way it is.
It won't. I suggest you get over it. Did it occur to you that you're not the sole user of this library and that there's plenty of users out there which actually depend on this behavior? I, for one, am a heavy user of Cecil, and it never bugged me, nor did it turn into a nightmare. But guess what, there's no issue with you building your own version of Cecil for your own usage with your own behavior. -- Jb Evain <[email protected]> -- -- mono-cecil
