Hey Fabian :) On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Fabian Schmied <[email protected]> wrote: > However, that's probably not what the member full name was intended > for, right?
Right. > So, manually implementing it would probably be the way to > go. Though manual implementation is much more cumbersome without being > able to put polymorphic methods on the respective TypeReference > subclasses :) Now that you can switch on .MetadataType it's actually not that bad. Agreed though. Jb -- -- mono-cecil
