Just tried it and no that's not it. Will think what it was ran into something like this before with our unique name generator
On Tuesday, August 2, 2011, Greg Young <[email protected]> wrote: > Last I checked i believe t's perfectly valid c# > > On Tuesday, August 2, 2011, Jb Evain <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Greg Young <[email protected]> wrote: >>> If I remember correctly there is an issue with doing this between a static >>> and a nonstatic method with same name + params eg >>> >>> Static int foo() >>> >>> And >>> >>> Int foo() >>> >>> Both come up as a::foo() >> >> The compiler lets you emit that? That wouldn't be nice of him. >> >> Jb >> >> -- >> -- >> mono-cecil > > -- > Le doute n'est pas une condition agréable, mais la certitude est absurde. > -- Le doute n'est pas une condition agréable, mais la certitude est absurde. -- -- mono-cecil
