Likely after 4.10, unless we get some contributions ☺
From: "Zinkevicius, Matt" <matt.zinkevic...@hpe.com>
Date: Monday, October 17, 2016 at 3:28 PM
To: Miguel de Icaza <mig...@microsoft.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org"
Subject: RE: [Mono-dev] TLS Providers
That is most excellent news! A build time option would be great. Would you
foresee this option being available in the 4.8, 4.10, or a later release?
(Would be helpful to know for our planning purposes)
From: Miguel de Icaza [mailto:mig...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 1:11 PM
To: Zinkevicius, Matt <matt.zinkevic...@hpe.com>; email@example.com
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] TLS Providers
What we want to do is to allow the user to configure at build time whether to
use BoringSSL that we maintain, or use a system installed version of OpenSSL,
that way Mono does not have to ship with the crypto, and if you update your
OpenSSL installation on the system, the updates will flow into Mono directly.
on behalf of "Zinkevicius, Matt"
Date: Friday, September 30, 2016 at 11:09 PM
Subject: [Mono-dev] TLS Providers
Congrats to the team on the new BoringSSL TLS backend!
Our team is attempting to get our appliance FIPS certified to be able to sell
into the US government. In our case, we must use the pre-approved version of
OpenSSL that’s installed on the box. My question is whether the plan is still
to allow developers to provider their own TLS provider assemblies (as described
I ask since reading the code in master seems to suggest this may no longer be
Mono-devel-list mailing list