On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 06:43 +0900, Atsushi Eno wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder which is the best way to have "almost duplicate" but > different parser/tokenizer pair for XSLT "Pattern" apart from > XPath (I'm going to fix a bug that allows improper XPath for > XSLT pattern e.g. namespace::*). > > With my way to do, they could be generated by attached patches: > > $ patch -i pattern-parser.diff System.Xml.XPath/Parser.jay -o > System.Xml.XPath/PatternParser.jay > $ patch -i pattern-parser.diff System.Xml.XPath/Tokenizer.cs -o > System.Xml.XPath/PatternTokenizer.cs > $ patch -i use-pattern-parser.diff > > ... but I wonder if there are better ways to do handle those > parser/tokenizer stuff, because parser/tokenizer patches are easy > to become broken when we fix XPath parser and/or tokenizer sources. > > Would it be better if I just put another parser/tokenizer pair?
Could we do an ifdef with jay and compile it twice? -- Ben _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
