I agree. Jerry van Leeuwen wrote: > > I think the only way to minimise confusion in the developer population > that does not keep up-to-date with the details of development on Mono > is to let at least the major version track full .NET compatibility. > That is, do not move to v2.x.x until at least .NET 2.0 can be fully > supported, do not move to v3.x.x until at least .NET 3.0 can be fully > supported and maybe even do not move to v3.5.x until .NET 3.5 is > supported. > > People that are aware of what is really going on under the hood will > be able to make more detailed judgement calls and will not really care > what version numbering you exactly use. It's the people that do not > glance further than the version number that need to be accomodated. > ------------------------------------------ > This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, > any use, disclosure or copying of this document is unauthorised and > prohibited. If you have received this document in error, please > delete the email and notify me by return email or by phoning the > NEMMCO Helpdesk on 1300 300 295. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list >
_______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
