On 10/30/07, Jerry van Leeuwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think the only way to minimise confusion in the developer population that > does not keep up-to-date with the details of development on Mono is to let > at least the major version track full .NET compatibility. That is, do not > move to v2.x.x until at least .NET 2.0 can be fully supported, do not move > to v3.x.x until at least .NET 3.0 can be fully supported and maybe even do > not move to v3.5.x until .NET 3.5 is supported. > > People that are aware of what is really going on under the hood will be able > to make more detailed judgement calls and will not really care what version > numbering you exactly use. It's the people that do not glance further than > the version number that need to be accomodated.
I'd vote for this solution. _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
