> System.Configuration.dll is only within 2.0, though I wouldn't care > much for dropping 1.x support. We could alternatively use environment > variable (we use it for registry and eventlogs for example).
I would definitely prefer to drop 1.1 support. The 2.0 language features, and not having to clutter the code with #ifdefs for the 2.0 only features will make the implementation much cleaner. If there are no objections I will move forward with a 2.0 only implementation. Mike. _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
