Hey Mike,

I think it would be ok to use an environment variable for both 1.0 and 2.0
profiles.

Gert

-----Original Message-----
From: mono-devel-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com
[mailto:mono-devel-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Barker
Sent: zaterdag 13 december 2008 20:16
To: Mono Development List
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] [PATCH] System.Messaging/AMQP: Receive, Send and
Peek implementation

On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Michael Barker <m...@middlesoft.co.uk>
wrote:
>> System.Configuration.dll is only within 2.0, though I wouldn't care
>> much for dropping 1.x support. We could alternatively use environment
>> variable (we use it for registry and eventlogs for example).
>
> I would definitely prefer to drop 1.1 support.  The 2.0 language
> features, and not having to clutter the code with #ifdefs for the 2.0
> only features will make the implementation much cleaner.  If there are
> no objections I will move forward with a 2.0 only implementation.

I've had a go at making System.Messaging 2.0 only, but there appears
to be 1.1 libraries that depend on it.  I think doing this will break
to many other libraries, so I am going to use an environment variable
for 1.1 and System.Configuration for 2.0.

Mike.
_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list

Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.15/1838 - Release Date: 12/8/2008
6:16 PM

_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list

Reply via email to