> On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 18:03, Reggie Burnett wrote: > > Marco > > > > Though I haven't had a lot of time lately to update it, I have been the > > general maintainer of the MySQL provider named ByteFX.Data. It is pure > C# > > and has been accepted has the replacement for the original > Mono.Data.MySql > > provider (which used libmysql.so) > > What're the motivations that conduced you to implement a provider in > pure C#? > > Isn't it more difficult to mantain than the wrapper over > libmysqlclient.so?
It is more difficult to maintain than libmysqlclient.so. Initially I did it because I wanted to but you should read all the email I get saying they are glad I developed a "native" provider instead of wrapping an existing one. > > Is ByteFX still believing in this project? Oh yes. My schedule is starting to clear and I plan on releasing a 1.0 very soon. > > Is the right man power allocated for this project? Is all we have enough? :-) > > What kind of maturity has MySQLNEt reached? The same maturity any project at a alpha/beta version 0.68 might have. Not finished, works pretty well, still has bugs. Reggie _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
