On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 19:33, Reggie Burnett wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 18:03, Reggie Burnett wrote: > > > Marco > > > > > > Though I haven't had a lot of time lately to update it, I have been the > > > general maintainer of the MySQL provider named ByteFX.Data. It is pure > > C# > > > and has been accepted has the replacement for the original > > Mono.Data.MySql > > > provider (which used libmysql.so) > > > > What're the motivations that conduced you to implement a provider in > > pure C#? > > > > Isn't it more difficult to mantain than the wrapper over > > libmysqlclient.so? > > It is more difficult to maintain than libmysqlclient.so. Initially I did it > because I wanted to but you should read all the email I get saying they are > glad I developed a "native" provider instead of wrapping an existing one.
Well, I'm glad too for this native provider. But what I wanna know is: is it really faster than the wrapper? And if yes, does the gap between them justifie the effort of mantaining a native provider? That said i wanna you to know that i really appreciate what you are doing, i'm just asking you these questions because i need to write a well done review. > > > > > Is ByteFX still believing in this project? > > Oh yes. My schedule is starting to clear and I plan on releasing a 1.0 very > soon. > > > > > Is the right man power allocated for this project? > > Is all we have enough? :-) > > > > > What kind of maturity has MySQLNEt reached? > > The same maturity any project at a alpha/beta version 0.68 might have. Not > finished, works pretty well, still has bugs. > > Reggie > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list -- Marco Canini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
