Paolo Molaro wrote:
I just fixed an issue in cvs that may be related (it was not an issue
with the size of the IL code, but with the number of symbolic registers
allocated for a single basic block). Care to try with mono from cvs
and/or to provide a test case if it still doesn't work?

Yay! I updated from CVS, and sure enough, my extremely large method (it contains 171484 bytes of IL and 5266 local variables!! I really need to make my compiler less dumb) now compiles and runs to completion. Your fix must have fixed my problem.


(It takes an *awfully* long time to JIT the method, though, so even though the final output is correct I will probably go with serialized literal data anyway...)

Thank you.

Tony

_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Reply via email to