On that note: it would be interesting to see: - Why did you have to patch it? - What are the typical mistakes? - What are the patterns for 'porting'/'patching'?
A suggestion: collect a list on the mono-wiki site. - URS C. MUFF SOFTWARE ARCHITECT - RESEARCH LAB, QUARK EIF QUARK INC. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e-mail transmission and any documents, files, or previous e-mail messages appended or attached to it, may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you must not read this transmission and that any disclosure, copying, printing, distribution, or use of the information contained or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone +1 (303) 894-3360 or return e-mail message [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete the original transmission, its attachments, and any copies without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sergio Blanco Cuaresma Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 7:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Mono-list] DasBlog I have tested DasBlog port and it is fantastic, but I have a question: the original DasBlog team will support the patches to make it compatible with Mono or this DasBlog port is just for testing? Thanks in advance. Sergio. -- [aka Marble] Web Personal <> http://www.marblestation.com Registered LiNUX user #140941 <> http://counter.li.org/ Socio #3274 de HispaLinux <> http://www.hispalinux.es Miembro de GPL URV <> http://www.gplurv.org GnuPG key: 0x0ED2CF9D <> hkp://pgp.escomposlinux.org _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
