On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 06:30, Urs Muff wrote: > On that note: it would be interesting to see: > - Why did you have to patch it? > - What are the typical mistakes? > - What are the patterns for 'porting'/'patching'?
Here are the beginnings of a porting document: http://www.jacksonh.net/jackson/blog/archive/2004/Jan-29.html Jackson > > A suggestion: collect a list on the mono-wiki site. > > - URS C. MUFF > SOFTWARE ARCHITECT - RESEARCH LAB, QUARK EIF > QUARK INC. > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > > This e-mail transmission and any documents, files, or previous e-mail > messages appended or attached to it, may contain information that is > confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, > or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are > hereby notified that you must not read this transmission and that any > disclosure, copying, printing, distribution, or use of the information > contained or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you > have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the > sender by telephone +1 (303) 894-3360 or return e-mail message > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete the original transmission, its attachments, and > any copies without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sergio Blanco > Cuaresma > Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 7:29 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Mono-list] DasBlog > > > I have tested DasBlog port and it is fantastic, but I have a question: > the original DasBlog team will support the patches to make it compatible > with Mono or this DasBlog port is just for testing? > > Thanks in advance. > > Sergio. _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
