ASP.NET is mainly just a collection of classes. The hack they call PHP doesn't even compare to it haha. Mono's ASP.NET support is actually very good.
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 07:39:35 +0700, Melinda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, in FAQ page of go-mono website, there are statements like this: > The controversial elements are the ASP.NET, ADO.NET and Windows.Forms > subsets. Those are convenient for people who need full compatibility > with the Windows platform, but are not required for the open source Mono > platform, nor integration with today's Mono's rich support of Linux. > > I understand if Windows.Forms is controversial because to implement it, > you have to use emulation so why bother. Just use something like Gtk#. > > What about Web services? ASP.NET is controversial according to the FAQ > page. And it said: .... are not required for the open source Mono > platform, nor .... > > Ok, it said ASP.NET is just for people who need full compatibility for > Winblows platform, but not required for the open source Mono. > > So what is the alternative for ASP.NET in open source platform? Maybe > PHP.NET? :) > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
