On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 08:23, Rodrigo B. de Oliveira wrote: > The question was not about how good the asp.net support on mono is right > now. The question, a valid one, was what's the recommended approach to > write web applications since asp.net is not covered by the ECMA spec, in > other words, what's the equivalent piece of technology in the mono > stack? > > I guess the answer is that right now we don't have one. That is what I mean. That is what keep me away from Mono. Mono is good to write desktop applications with GTK# but for web services.... :(
> > all the best, > Rodrigo > > Em Qui, 2004-06-10 �s 21:54, Cory Nelson escreveu: > > ASP.NET is mainly just a collection of classes. > > > > The hack they call PHP doesn't even compare to it haha. Mono's > > ASP.NET support is actually very good. > > > > On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 07:39:35 +0700, Melinda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Ok, in FAQ page of go-mono website, there are statements like this: > > > The controversial elements are the ASP.NET, ADO.NET and Windows.Forms > > > subsets. Those are convenient for people who need full compatibility > > > with the Windows platform, but are not required for the open source Mono > > > platform, nor integration with today's Mono's rich support of Linux. > > > > > > .... > > > > > > Ok, it said ASP.NET is just for people who need full compatibility for > > > Winblows platform, but not required for the open source Mono. > > > > > > So what is the alternative for ASP.NET in open source platform? Maybe > > > PHP.NET? :) > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
