> Mhm, then I misunderstood. You just missed your whole patch for > what you really need (in fact that is what I was afraid of).
No. I did not want to touch driver.cs because of the reason that "/doc" would be provided for the standard XML-doc style as in MS .Net framework. However, the Documentation part would be standard. The only extension that I need is that I want raw string and not XMLElement. As such, my patch "is" complete in itself. To get XMLElement for "/doc", just call "CreateComment" on the document collected. > Please provide all what you should put to require mcs hackers Already said - I need raw comments, with "///" and "/**" included. > If you are going to create another tool, then you should keep > your changes on those mcs sources in your local mcs copy, so that The reason is "/doc" is a standard switch thought about being provided in mcs as well. My patch provides basic infrastructure to it. Only that it does not generate and XML-file or validate or create any XML-nodes. > other mcs hackers don't have to be bothered about whatever they > never use. The patch definitely has a use -- as said above. Cheers, Gaurav Vaish http://csdoc.sf.net --------------------- _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
