Hey, Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] wrote: > einKI.ml escribió: >>> If you don't want to use ASP.NET and/or System.Windows.Form it's up to you >>> but note that the fact that there is a closed source implementation of them >>> (i.e. Microsoft .NET Framewrok) doesn't mean that you should avoid their >>> open source implementations (i.e. Mono or Portable.NET, IMHO Mono is much >>> better:). >> Im just wondering because they are listed as "controversial elements" in >> the FAQ. But since I am somewhat familiar with ASP.NET I think it make >> sense to use it on Linux too. > > There are other frameworks that you can use without ASP.NET AFAIK, that > Miguel has not mentioned (perhaps the ones he has mentioned are too tied > to the AJAX-thing, I mean, they require JavaScript):
Miguel mentioned projects that don't use System.Web at all. Dream depends only on some HttpUtility methods (HtmlEncode, etc.), while Jitzu is completely System.Web independent. > > - Maverick.NET (if you use non-ASP.NET methods for the view, such as > XSLT+XML+XHTML or NVelocity) > [ http://mavnet.sourceforge.net/ ] It depends on System.Web > > - CastleProject (the Ruby on Rails port to C#) > [ http://www.castleproject.org/ ] It depends on System.Web, too. > > - Spring.NET (I haven't used this one but seems a port of the Spring > framework from Java to C# that uses AOP) > [ http://www.springframework.net/ ] It depends on System.Web as well. > Using these frameworks you are not only avoiding the use of ASP.NET but You don't. Robert _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
