The CAB is really very good. Now they are creating the CAB for ASP.NET that will be extremely useful. The Novell could try to change this license for us. ;) hehehhe
[]s 2007/1/3, Corbin Hoenes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Scott Guthrie? I'll put in my word for changing the license to SharedSource but in my experience Microsoft has never been very good at listening to their forums / users :) Do you think that with Novell's recent deal with Microsoft that there could be some extra leverage to get this to happen? We've been spending lots of time on the CAB and I don't know how I built apps without some kind of plugin/composite framework before. The other option is to have the MonoDevelop add-in architecture be a seperate enough that people can build plugin architectures with it rather than something like CAB. The nice thing about CAB is ObjectBuilder and it's dependency injection.... On 1/3/07, Miguel de Icaza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > > :( > > > > The old problem of the licenses… > > I once spoke with Scott about this issue (it was related to the license > chosen for the starter kits) and he said that it was probably an > oversight and that they would not mind changing the license. > > You could try contacting them and asking them to use the other > SharedSousrce license that does not include the "Only on Windows" > clause. > > Miguel > > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
_______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
