My be good idea would be to create separated like little bit un-official wiki, where users could easily post their articles (like gentoo-wiki.com, etc...)?
As I see current mono wiki is like Front Page/Main web site of MONO project, and it is not allowable, that there could be some incompleteness. It is built on wiki engine but it's primary function is WEB CMS system (I think so). Madars. On 8/27/07, Adam Tauno Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Yes, this isn't ideal. Personally, I wonder how much vandalism we'd > > > > actually see; on the other hand, Mono tends to be so short on > resources > > > > that any vandalism probably wouldn't be seen/fixed until slashdot > > > > mentions it on their front page... > > > Exactly, we do not have a full time editor and admin to keep up the > site > > > up to date. > > > The other issue that we have is that even if we open accounts for > folks, > > > we usually see small bursts of work (a day or two) and then most > people > > > vanish. > > A lot of small bursts is usually better than none at all. :) > > But that's just my $0.02. > > My $0.02; no it isn't. The mono wiki already contains too many > completely abbreviated & incomplete articles. No article would be > better IMHO, then at least it wouldn't be polluting the Google search > results. Take - http://www.mono-project.com/DB4BOO - for instance. The > *LAST* sentence is: "Now that you have an idea of what Boo looks like, > let's move forward.", it never even touches on what the article > purports to be about. Short bursts don't really provide any useful > content. +1 for staying with the current policy. > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > > >
_______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
