Hubert FONGARNAND wrote: > Yes, everibody knows that there's serious problem with performance in > mono... (see https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342190) > but Miguel has said that fixing performance problem is a long-term > project... (they prefer focusing on more funny thing...)
Yeah, this also explains why one of those benchmarks (mandelbrot) is 1.5-1.9 times faster on Mono than on MS.NET. Robert > > Hubert > > > > Le jeudi 29 novembre 2007 à 10:34 +0000, Robert Hulme a écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> I have recently been part of a discussion with colleagues about the >> merits of C# versus Java. I am of the opinion that C# is a superior >> language, but my colleagues questioned whether the performance is >> comparable on Linux (which is what we use here at EBI). >> >> I had a look on the Language Shootout, comparing Mono 1.2.5 with Java 6 >> -server. >> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=csharp >> >> In almost all the benchmarks Mono C# was significantly slower than Java 6. >> >> I downloaded some of the benchmarks to see if I could reproduce the >> results on my machine (Mono JIT compiler version 1.2.3.1 / Java 6). The >> results were the same. Twiddling with mono / mcs flags didn't seem to >> make a difference. >> >> I was wondering if anyone had any insights in to why this is, whether it >> is a CIL/C# issue or is specific to the Mono implementation, and whether >> there are any plans to bring Mono performance in line with Java performance. >> >> Many thanks, >> Robert Hulme >> > > _________________________________________________ > Ce message et les éventuels documents joints peuvent contenir des > informations confidentielles. > Au cas où il ne vous serait pas destiné, nous vous remercions de bien vouloir > le supprimer et en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur. Toute utilisation de ce > message non conforme à sa destination, toute diffusion ou publication, totale > ou partielle et quel qu'en soit le moyen est formellement interdite. > Les communications sur internet n'étant pas sécurisées, l'intégrité de ce > message n'est pas assurée et la société émettrice ne peut être tenue pour > responsable de son contenu. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
