> Sorry, I'll drop this point. > > It would have been really really simple when the language was conceived > to consider that a simple test for object existance should not require the > specification of a null constant;
It would make things very weird, things like !((object) true)) would return true. > nor should it require the extra overhead of a comparison operator. A really simple check for existance. A few more characters generally make a language more explicit and easier to understand, and it avoids weird issues like the above, which can be really annoying if you stumble upon them. Rolf _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
