d3x0r wrote: > > Sorry, I'll drop this point. > > It would have been really really simple when the language was conceived to > consider that a simple test for object existance should not require the > specification of a null constant; nor should it require the extra overhead > of a comparison operator. A really simple check for existance.
"null" is a keyword in C#. There is no such thing like a null constant. Anyway, if you can't stand the current C# specification, don't hesitate to modify your own copy of gmcs, but don't touch System.Object or any other public API. This will assure that your assemblies are still working on MS.NET and on other people's mono installation. Good luck. Robert _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
