Juan,
NUnit requires the nunit.framework assembly to be either in the GAC, or in the same directory as the test assembly. I would like to see this changed, but Charlie (NUnit) prefers to keep things as is. I don't think any of the other assemblies need to be in the GAC though. Gert PS. I'm copying Charlie in on this, so he can correct me if necessary. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juan C. Olivares Sent: dinsdag 25 november 2008 14:50 To: Sebastien Pouliot Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Mono-list] SPAM-LOW: Re: NUnit Version - Upgrade soon? Mono installs its NUnit version on the GAC when you compile mono. If it's a private version, why it's installed on the GAC? Regards Juan C. Olivares On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Sebastien Pouliot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Charlie, On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 23:38 -0800, Charlie Poole wrote: > I didn't know it was your archive, but if you need it > then it seemed to make sense that there would be some > changes. If not, why build it from source at all? > > This isn't a criticism - just something I'm trying to > get an understanding about. There seems to be some > obstacle to NUnit adoption (I don't mean obsolete > versions, but up to date ones) in the Mono community > and I'd like to figure out the reasons. You simply did too well on NUnit 2.2 ;-) and no one, until Atsushi, needed the features "badly" enough to update the mono tree (potentially a huge task). OTOH this might have been interpreted by other people as being the (only?) "supported" version - even if we have been saying, for years, not to confuse the old Mono's version with the latest and greatest NUnit available. Sebastien > > Charlie > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atsushi Eno > > Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 10:19 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Mono-list] SPAM-LOW: Re: NUnit Version - Upgrade soon? > > > > It is anything but negative approach. As I wrote earlier, I > > believe this is a mono bug that likely hits other projects > > and should be fixed in mono land. > > > > I'll try to cook a repro and file a bug. > > > > For the record, there is almost no change in NUnit code in my archive. > > We just have to change AssemblyInfo (assembly key location), > > remove tests (they are extra in our source tree) and extra > > stuff such as GUI. > > It is straightforward upstream code. Believe or not, just diff them ;) > > > > Atsushi Eno > > > > > > Charlie Poole wrote: > > > I think a more positive approach would be to work with the NUnit > > > project so that you can just use the upstream code. > > > > > > Charlie > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Atsushi Eno > > >> Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 4:30 PM > > >> To: [email protected] > > >> Subject: SPAM-LOW: Re: [Mono-list] NUnit Version - Upgrade soon? > > >> > > >> You almost do not have to do that: > > >> http://veritas-vos-liberabit.com/tmp/2008/nunit24-mono.tar.bz2 > > >> > > >> It builds but does not work anyways right now, probably because of > > >> some type resolution bugs between nunit-console.dll and > > >> nunit-console.exe. > > >> > > >> If you have patch for mono (diff in mono/mcs, not diff in > > >> nunit) to fix any issues, that is welcome. > > >> > > >> Atsushi Eno > > >> > > >> > > >> Michael Franz wrote: > > >>> OK, > > >>> > > >>> I thought I read somewhere that there were patches to NUnit > > >> that were > > >>> mono specific. > > >>> > > >>> Is it ok to submit patches to mono that depend on the > > >> latest version > > >>> of NUnit? > > >>> > > >>> Michael > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Miguel de Icaza > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Hello, > > >>> > > >>> > What changes to NUnit were specific to Mono? > > >>> > > > >>> > Is there a list of these features? > > >>> > > >>> You are confused; There are no changes, you should > > >> just not depend on > > >>> Mono's built-in and private copy of NUnit to write your > > >> NUnit test > > >>> cases. > > >>> > > >>> You should get the latest NUnit. > > >>> > > >>> > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 10:54 PM, Miguel de Icaza > > >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > >>> > wrote: > > >>> > Hello, > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > I use NUnit for work and have been using > > >> the latest version > > >>> > for > > >>> > > months. I wrote some test for Mono and > > >> found out that the > > >>> > version > > >>> > > that Mono is using does not support some > > >> of the asserts > > >>> I am > > >>> > using > > >>> > > (IsEmpty). Is there any plan to upgrade > > >> the version of > > >>> > NUnit that is > > >>> > > used with the Mono build/test? > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > The NUnit that ships with Mono should be considered > > >>> Mono's own > > >>> > copy of > > >>> > NUnit and not a public version of it. > > >>> > > > >>> > We should probably make packages of the > > >> latest version of > > >>> > NUnit, > > >>> > encourage the NUnit developer to maintain > > >> those and encourage > > >>> > developers > > >>> > to use the public NUnit as opposed to the > > >> private copy that > > >>> > Mono ships. > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> - > > >>> -- > > >>> > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > >>> Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > > >>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > > >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.9/1806 - Release Date: 11/22/2008 6:59 PM
_______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
