> Hello Charlie, > > On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 23:38 -0800, Charlie Poole wrote: > > I didn't know it was your archive, but if you need it then > it seemed > > to make sense that there would be some changes. If not, why > build it > > from source at all? > > > > This isn't a criticism - just something I'm trying to get an > > understanding about. There seems to be some obstacle to > NUnit adoption > > (I don't mean obsolete versions, but up to date ones) in the Mono > > community and I'd like to figure out the reasons. > > You simply did too well on NUnit 2.2 ;-) and no one, until > Atsushi, needed the features "badly" enough to update the > mono tree (potentially a huge task).
Ah, flattery works for sure :-) But yes, 2.2 has all the stuff needed for the kinds of tests Mono has - except possibly parameterized tests, which could make writing them easier, but that doesn't come till 2.5. > OTOH this might have been interpreted by other people as being the > (only?) "supported" version - even if we have been saying, > for years, not to confuse the old Mono's version with the > latest and greatest NUnit available. Yes, this confusion is what I'm talking about. The built-in install appears to be "in the way" of any other installation, unless it's a private install like the one Monodevelop provides. Charlie > Sebastien > > > > > Charlie > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Atsushi Eno > > > Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 10:19 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [Mono-list] SPAM-LOW: Re: NUnit Version - > Upgrade soon? > > > > > > It is anything but negative approach. As I wrote earlier, > I believe > > > this is a mono bug that likely hits other projects and should be > > > fixed in mono land. > > > > > > I'll try to cook a repro and file a bug. > > > > > > For the record, there is almost no change in NUnit code > in my archive. > > > We just have to change AssemblyInfo (assembly key > location), remove > > > tests (they are extra in our source tree) and extra stuff such as > > > GUI. > > > It is straightforward upstream code. Believe or not, just > diff them > > > ;) > > > > > > Atsushi Eno > > > > > > > > > Charlie Poole wrote: > > > > I think a more positive approach would be to work with > the NUnit > > > > project so that you can just use the upstream code. > > > > > > > > Charlie > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > > Atsushi Eno > > > >> Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 4:30 PM > > > >> To: [email protected] > > > >> Subject: SPAM-LOW: Re: [Mono-list] NUnit Version - > Upgrade soon? > > > >> > > > >> You almost do not have to do that: > > > >> http://veritas-vos-liberabit.com/tmp/2008/nunit24-mono.tar.bz2 > > > >> > > > >> It builds but does not work anyways right now, > probably because > > > >> of some type resolution bugs between nunit-console.dll and > > > >> nunit-console.exe. > > > >> > > > >> If you have patch for mono (diff in mono/mcs, not diff in > > > >> nunit) to fix any issues, that is welcome. > > > >> > > > >> Atsushi Eno > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Michael Franz wrote: > > > >>> OK, > > > >>> > > > >>> I thought I read somewhere that there were patches to NUnit > > > >> that were > > > >>> mono specific. > > > >>> > > > >>> Is it ok to submit patches to mono that depend on the > > > >> latest version > > > >>> of NUnit? > > > >>> > > > >>> Michael > > > >>> > > > >>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Miguel de Icaza > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> Hello, > > > >>> > > > >>> > What changes to NUnit were specific to Mono? > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Is there a list of these features? > > > >>> > > > >>> You are confused; There are no changes, you should > > > >> just not depend on > > > >>> Mono's built-in and private copy of NUnit to write your > > > >> NUnit test > > > >>> cases. > > > >>> > > > >>> You should get the latest NUnit. > > > >>> > > > >>> > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 10:54 PM, Miguel de Icaza > > > >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > > >>> > wrote: > > > >>> > Hello, > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > I use NUnit for work and have been using > > > >> the latest version > > > >>> > for > > > >>> > > months. I wrote some test for Mono and > > > >> found out that the > > > >>> > version > > > >>> > > that Mono is using does not support some > > > >> of the asserts > > > >>> I am > > > >>> > using > > > >>> > > (IsEmpty). Is there any plan to upgrade > > > >> the version of > > > >>> > NUnit that is > > > >>> > > used with the Mono build/test? > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > The NUnit that ships with Mono should > be considered > > > >>> Mono's own > > > >>> > copy of > > > >>> > NUnit and not a public version of it. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > We should probably make packages of the > > > >> latest version of > > > >>> > NUnit, > > > >>> > encourage the NUnit developer to maintain > > > >> those and encourage > > > >>> > developers > > > >>> > to use the public NUnit as opposed to the > > > >> private copy that > > > >>> > Mono ships. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > - > > > >> - > > > >>> -- > > > >>> > > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > > >>> Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > > > >>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > > > >> _______________________________________________ > > > >> Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > > > >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > > > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > > _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
