Hi Charlie, Charlie Poole wrote: > I missed seeing this note when you first sent it, but I'll > reply now with a comments and a questions. > > Comment: You are incorrect about how folks install NUnit on > Windows. It doesn't go into the GAC at all.
Oh I blindly thought they do (like I do), since it requires every nunit dll in use either in the GAC or copied locally (and copying them locally is messy). You are right at the point that the installer does not install those dlls in the GAC, and that is not what I intended. > Question: Am I wrong in believing that you can't build and test > mono if you overwrite the copy of NUnit that comes with Mono? > If I am wrong, then there's no real problem, but maybe still > enough of an apparent problem to confuse some people. We can't? I guess no, and hence I assume there's no real problem. As you would already know, there was no code change in the outcome assemblies. We cannot cure people's confusion while we are doing the right stuff. Or I may be misunderstanding you on what causes some people(?) get confused. > If you want to attract folks to Mono, then I think it's > important not to confuse them. :-) If there's reasonable reason people get confused because of my interpretation or effort on upgrading nunit version, then I feel sorry ;) Atsushi Eno _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
