Follow up question on application installs: The whole autotools thing seems like a bit of overkill for a pure .NET application. Is it reasonable to just use a simple install target that copies everything under $(prefix)?
Any good examples to look at? Charlie > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Charlie Poole > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 12:33 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: 'List Mono' > Subject: Re: [Mono-list] SPAM-LOW: Re: NUnit Version - Upgrade soon? > > Hi Andreas, > > Thanks, that's good info. It's more or less easy to read docs > and figure out technical stuff, but knowing just what will > meet folk's expectations is harder. > > Charlie > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 9:05 AM > > To: Charlie Poole > > Cc: List Mono > > Subject: Re: [Mono-list] SPAM-LOW: Re: NUnit Version - Upgrade soon? > > > > Hi, > > > > Am 02.12.2008 um 04:53 schrieb Charlie Poole: > > > > > What do you think about "pure" makefile-based setups versus > > > makefile+NAnt? It seems like the latter would be a plus for > > > building on Windows as well as Linux. > > > > NAnt would be another build dependency, so consider it a minus for > > other Unices. > > I remember having issues building 0.85 on OSX (0.86 beta > worked better > > though). > > > > Andreas > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
