> Considering that Mono 2.4 supports anyway an old version of .NET framework > (developers here are on 3.5 if I am not wrong) I think Mono 1.9 is (too) > older and might add further problems. The version numbers for Mono and .NET do not align because there are major portions of .NET that are less important to Mono users than others (for instance, WPF).
For ASP.NET development, Mono 2.4 essentially supports most of what is in .NET 3.5 (minus LINQ to SQL and WCF, though those are in progress). For a proof of concept like you are proposing, since Mono is packaged and QA tested on SUSE, I would suggest starting with the openSUSE VMware image Mono hosts, see if Mono 2.4 is going to be capable of meeting your needs, and spare yourself the pain of building and configuring Mono for another distribution for a later day. --Joseph _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
