Why not just use gconf? Then we can use things like gconf-editor. On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Everaldo Canuto wrote:
> > > > > >That way if the admin wants to have mono sandboxed to 'ini' style > >flat files, then it's possible. I advocate flat files - it's not > >as if there will be huge amounts of data stored ... or will there be? > > > >Suggestions > >ini files > >xml files > >berkley db > > > I think that Register Class implementation of Mono must be like a MS > implementation, for compatibility. > On Windows, Register was huge amount of data, I think that it will be > equal in the Windows. This discards the possibility to use flat files. > > A good ideia is the use of Berkeley DB. So...What it is better? gdbm , > db2 or db3? > What do you think about this? > > Sorry by my english. I promise that I will start to study English. > Everaldo Canuto > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
