> The approach that we are taking is a bit lame, but would allow us to catch up quickly to Microsoft (basically, use Libxslt with PInvoke to get the core of theDuh.. I just looked at the System.Xml.Xsl code and there it is.. (the PInvoke stuff for Libxslt).
workd done on temporary files)
Is there already something present, or would I need to write this from scratch (example: is the Libxslt PInvoke 'wrapper' already written?)
So now I'm not exactly sure what you would like me to do. Do you want a System.Xml.Xsl implementation without using Libxslt (completely in C#)?
---
Jeroen Janssen
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
