Bruno Hertz wrote: > Who ever called 'ls' with a directory name as param might think > different. Shell expansion is non recursive either. Actually, most > commands work non recursive without explicit request. Take rm -rf as > another example.
conversely, cvs diff dir etc. do act recursively, iirc, and can be told to not recurse with -l, which is where I pulled the idea for --local from. > If you want directory restrictions to act recursively per default, > please do so, I for one don't really care. But providing the means to > limit the level of recursiveness would still make an awful lot of > sense. > > Apart from that, if 'commit .' committed the files in pwd only I > really can't say I'd be that surprised. certainly, given the same args and possibly --local option, commit, status, diff, revert should all act on the same things! Cheers, Derek _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel